One of the best examples is so simple, it's just, you know, all these symbiotic relationships
are my favorite ones, just birds and bees and flowers and plants.
How could you have flowers that need to be cross-pollinated with other plants?
That's how they reproduce.
They need, they rely on insects to be able to do that, and you know what, the insects,
the bees rely on the nectar and their pollen to be able to survive and to make their hives
and to do everything else.
They need each other, equally, to survive.
And through evolution, if things were just coming about just randomly, through random
process, through survival of the fittest, which, survival of the fittest just means
more creatures are dying than anything else, because that just happens to be the one that
survives.
It's not this great expansion of life, it's a reduction of life.
That's what survival of the fittest is, folks.
When you're in harsh condition, only so many people are going to make it through, well,
you're reducing a population, not expanding it.
Which is, again, just completely contrary to this concept of evolution, oh, there's
all these new species and all this new, well, that's not survival of the fittest, then.
And how could you have, I mean, what would be the odds of that happening of two creatures
morphing, changing, evolving into something that's going to be completely 100% reliant
on one another?
And see, I like to just throw time at it.
Well, I mean, yeah, of course, in 100 years that can't happen, but over millions and millions
of years, then that could happen.
No, it can't happen in a day, it can't happen in a year, it can't happen in a thousand years,
and it can't happen in a million years.
Sorry.
It just doesn't happen.
It's not the way that God created things.
Dogs don't become cats, cats don't become birds, you cannot observe this.
But what they like to do is they like to show you where there is microevolution, evolution
within creatures themselves, where they could change and adapt to their surroundings, which
again is another amazing design of God in his creation to create beings that if their
environment changes are able to adapt to still survive within that environment.
What foreknowledge, what insight, what great planning to allow in their DNA code the ability
to be able to adapt.
That's amazing.
That doesn't happen by chance.
It's not just, oh, our environment changed, now my body or my, you know, a creature's
body is just going to start doing different things because the environment changed without
the body knowing how to do those things.
When you study things down, you know, the body's doing what it's programmed to do.
The functions of all your organs are doing what they're designed to do.
That's pre-programmed.
It requires intelligence to even function.
The apparent age with human beings, we see that with Adam and Eve.
We see that with the fruit-bearing trees.
I mean, you think about it, if you were to look at Adam on day one of creation, he's
going to look like a mature adult.
If anyone were to ask you if you were to see him, you'd be like, man, how old is that guy?
I don't know.
I mean, 20, 30, 40, depending on how he looked, right?
You just look at him and say, yeah, that's what he looks like.
But he'd really be a day old.
If you were to look at the trees, look at, maybe there's some redwood trees, right, that
are fully mature.
Well, how long have these been?
Well, man, these have been, these are, you know, to get the tree that big, that must
have been around for hundreds of years or whatever.
But at creation, it's day one.
So the other problem that science has with trying to date things is that you're going
to end up looking at things that God created instantly to look like they've been there
for a really long period of time.
And that fact alone is enough to skew results.
And you know, for those of you that know anything about like astronomy and quantum theory and
all that, you know, there's different measurements that you can take where they try to determine
how far away galaxies are and stars are and things like that.
And look, there's nothing wrong in general, you know, like with science, science, that's
true science is good.
But when they're trying to say things are so far away, but then how can we possibly
see those light if it takes light so long to travel across, you know, the space to get
here?
Okay, I mean, you're still following some science, yeah, I get that, I can see that.
And I can see we could be confused, except for the fact that when God created everything,
He already created that light travel path to be in existence on day one so that Adam
can see stars.
He didn't create the stars on day four, like just, okay, the light's there, and now that
light has to travel to get to the Earth.
So that way on day six, when Adam was created, he looks up and he doesn't see anything.
He's waiting for the light to get there.
No, he already made that light path and way and all the photons and everything there at
that moment.
And if you don't understand that and have that faith, you're going to come up with all
kinds of wrong answers when you're trying to determine ages of things without considering
and going back to the beginning and going back to the start.
It's so important that Genesis, the beginning, it's the first book in the Bible.
Genesis means the beginning, it's the creation, it's the beginning of everything.
If you're going to understand a theory about how everything came into being, you have to
go back to the beginning, and no matter how many theories of evolution they try to push
and try to use all this other evidence, you have to go, well, where does life come from?
And they turn to abiogenesis, which is life came from nothing.
Living material came from non-living material, which is not science because it's not observed
ever anywhere.
It doesn't happen.
Life always comes from other living materials that already exist.
Well, where did first life come from?
It doesn't just spontaneously happen.
But that's what you have to believe in order to believe in the atheist religion of the
Big Bang and evolution.